If you mean the paternity records of Chloe's unborn child, yes, we do. When Ian first hacked into St. Mary's, the paternity showed Philip as the father, and the very next time when he was going to change it to Daniel (for Stephanie) it was already changed to Daniel.
I don't see how that's possible since Philip's DNA was not used as a source. I have missed a lot in the past two weeks or so and am still not caught up but do you possibly mean that the test was negative for Daniel, then positive later?
Thanks. Then I think the person entering the data at the hospital simply checked the wrong box. That's whan Ian saw it. That mistake was immediately corrected to show the child as belonging to Daniel.
Please take a moment to update your bookmarks / Favorites in your browser to reflect https://www.salemspectator.com (instead of starting with http://). This should fix the "not secure" or "insecure" message some of you may have been experiencing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.