DrBakerFan
Well-Known Member
Poirot, in this case, the spousal privilege can only be waived by the accused husband/wife. If Nancy married Clyde, she would be barred from testifying about anything she learned because of her marriage to Clyde unless he agreed to it. (She could testify about anything she learned before the marriage.) As for Clyde, how can anyone who works in the Pub kitchen smell like vanilla?. More likely, he'd reek of Brady Burger grease or eau de clam chowder. I'd agree that Clyde's the reddest of red herrings. Clyde is a conniver and has absolutely no motive to harm either Abigail or Sonny.While the law says a wife cannot be forced to testify against her husband, I don't think there is anything preventing her from doing so of her own free will. If she wants to, she can. Yep, could be very wrong, maybe it varies state to state? But Lisa K. is right.....Nancy has a temper and can show it. I just feel for her, (if Clyde is guilty,) as she spoke of being married so long and fooled by someone she thought loved her, but was cheating.
Last edited: